- android.gs
- Compare
- Blade GT vs Camon 40 Pro 4G
Doogee Blade GT vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
What Blade GT does better (6) and where Camon 40 Pro 4G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display8.6
8.0Camera9.1
6.7Battery7.9
8.2Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade GTCamon 40 Pro 4G
| Blade GT | Camon 40 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.5 mm | 164.4 mm | +14.1 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 74.3 mm | +9.2 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 7.3 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Weight | 260 g | 178 g | +82 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade GT better than Camon 40 Pro 4G?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- 5GYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+6%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 40 Pro 4G better than Blade GT?
- Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
- OLED panelNo · Blade GT: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT: Yes
- Weight260 g vs 178 g+46%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 50 MP2.5×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Thickness10.5 mm vs 7.3 mm+44%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.1% vs 90%+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 260 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 178.5 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.1% | 90% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 600,062 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 30 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
