- android.gs
- Compare
- Blade GT vs K13 Turbo Pro
Doogee Blade GT vs OPPO K13 Turbo Pro
What Blade GT does better (3) and where K13 Turbo Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display9.4
8.0Camera8.1
6.7Battery9.2
8.2Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade GTK13 Turbo Pro
| Blade GT | K13 Turbo Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.5 mm | 162.8 mm | +15.7 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 77.2 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 7.3 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Weight | 260 g | 208 g | +52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade GT better than K13 Turbo Pro?
- Memory card slotYes · K13 Turbo Pro: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · K13 Turbo Pro: No
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
Why is K13 Turbo Pro better than Blade GT?
- Wired charging18 W vs 80 W4.4×
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+27%
- OLED panelNo · Blade GT: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Weight260 g vs 208 g+25%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+23%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density392 ppi vs 453 ppi+16%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx9+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 260 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 178.5 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP69 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx9 |
| Glass protection | — | AGC DT-Star D+ |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Silver Knight, Purple Phantom, Midnight Maverick |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.1% | 89.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 825 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,341,700 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,385 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 63% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 30 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
