How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Blade GT vs Pixel 9a

Doogee Blade GT vs Google Pixel 9a

What Blade GT does better (7) and where Pixel 9a wins (19) — every spec side by side.

Doogee Blade GT
Doogee · 2025Blade GT
8.0Score
7 advantages≈ $370
vs
Google Pixel 9a
Google · 2025Pixel 9a
8.8Score
19 advantages≈ $340
Higher score
6.9Display8.1
8.0Camera8.2
6.7Battery5.5
8.2Features9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade GTPixel 9a
83.5 × 178.510.573.3 × 154.78.9
Blade GTPixel 9aDifference
Height178.5 mm154.7 mm+23.8 mm
Width83.5 mm73.3 mm+10.2 mm
Thickness10.5 mm8.9 mm+1.6 mm
Weight260 g186 g+74 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade GT better than Pixel 9a?

  1. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  2. Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+8%
  3. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  4. Memory card slotYes · Pixel 9a: No
  5. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.3″+7%
  6. Selfie camera20 MP vs 13 MP+54%
  7. Battery charge cycles1,300 vs 1,000+30%

Why is Pixel 9a better than Blade GT?

  1. OLED panelNo · Blade GT: Yes
  2. Wireless chargingNo · Blade GT: Yes
  3. Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT: Yes
  4. Wired charging18 W vs 23 W+28%
  5. Weight260 g vs 186 g+40%
  6. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  7. 4K selfie videoNo · Blade GT: Yes
  8. eSIMNo · Blade GT: Yes
  9. Energy classE vs B
  10. Repairability classC vs B
  11. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+19%
  12. Pixel density392 ppi vs 422 ppi+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Doogee Blade GTDoogee Blade GT≈ $3708.0
Google Pixel 9aGoogle Pixel 9a≈ $3408.8
Design
Weight260 g186 g
Thickness10.5 mm8.9 mm
Height178.5 mm154.7 mm
Width83.5 mm73.3 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursBlack, SilverObsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony
Display
Screen size6.7″6.3″
PanelIPS LCDP-OLED
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,424 px
Pixel density392 ppi422 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—2,700 nits
Measured brightness—1,930 nits
Screen-to-body ratio73.1%83.5%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050Google Tensor G4
Chip makerMediaTekGoogle
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz3.1 GHz
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G715 MP7
AnTuTu score—1,254,417
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,527
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,630
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP48 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size—1/2.0"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera20 MP13 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,500 mAh5,100 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—12.7 h
Wired charging18 W23 W
Charged in 30 min—47%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—8 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-27.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy classEB
Battery charge cycles1,3001,000
Endurance per cycle30 h52 h
Repairability classCB
Drop resistance classAA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare