How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Blade GT Pro vs Pixel 9a

Doogee Blade GT Pro vs Google Pixel 9a

What Blade GT Pro does better (9) and where Pixel 9a wins (20) — every spec side by side.

Doogee Blade GT Pro
Doogee · 2025Blade GT Pro
7.7Score
9 advantages≈ $370
vs
Google Pixel 9a
Google · 2025Pixel 9a
8.8Score
20 advantages≈ $340
Higher score
6.9Display8.1
7.4Camera8.2
6.8Battery5.5
7.6Features9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade GT ProPixel 9a
83.5 × 178.510.573.3 × 154.78.9
Blade GT ProPixel 9aDifference
Height178.5 mm154.7 mm+23.8 mm
Width83.5 mm73.3 mm+10.2 mm
Thickness10.5 mm8.9 mm+1.6 mm
Weight265 g186 g+79 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade GT Pro better than Pixel 9a?

  1. Main camera100 MP vs 48 MP2.1×
  2. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+14%
  5. Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
  6. Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
  7. Memory card slotYes · Pixel 9a: No
  8. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.3″+7%
  9. Battery charge cycles1,400 vs 1,000+40%

Why is Pixel 9a better than Blade GT Pro?

  1. OLED panelNo · Blade GT Pro: Yes
  2. Optical stabilisationNo · Blade GT Pro: Yes
  3. Wireless chargingNo · Blade GT Pro: Yes
  4. Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT Pro: Yes
  5. Wired charging18 W vs 23 W+28%
  6. Weight265 g vs 186 g+42%
  7. CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+24%
  8. Max video1080p vs 4K
  9. 4K selfie videoNo · Blade GT Pro: Yes
  10. eSIMNo · Blade GT Pro: Yes
  11. Energy classE vs B
  12. Repairability classC vs B
Specifications

Side by side

Google Pixel 9aGoogle Pixel 9a≈ $3408.8
Design
Weight265 g186 g
Thickness10.5 mm8.9 mm
Height178.5 mm154.7 mm
Width83.5 mm73.3 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursBlack, SilverObsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony
Display
Screen size6.7″6.3″
PanelIPS LCDP-OLED
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,424 px
Pixel density392 ppi422 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—2,700 nits
Measured brightness—1,930 nits
Screen-to-body ratio73.1%83.5%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7025Google Tensor G4
Chip makerMediaTekGoogle
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.5 GHz3.1 GHz
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G715 MP7
AnTuTu score—1,254,417
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,527
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,630
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)512 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera100 MP48 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size—1/2.0"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p4K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP13 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,800 mAh5,100 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—12.7 h
Wired charging18 W23 W
Charged in 30 min—47%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—8 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-27.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy classEB
Battery charge cycles1,4001,000
Endurance per cycle36 h52 h
Repairability classCB
Drop resistance classAA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare