android.gs
Compare
Blade GT Play vs Hot 60 Pro+

Doogee Blade GT Play vs Infinix Hot 60 Pro+

What Blade GT Play does better (7) and where Hot 60 Pro+ wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Doogee · 2025Blade GT Play

7.4Score

7 advantages≈ $350

Higher score

Infinix · 2025Hot 60 Pro+

7.2Score

10 advantages

6.9Display9.8

5.5Camera5.2

6.8Battery5.5

7.6Features5.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade GT PlayHot 60 Pro+

	Blade GT Play	Hot 60 Pro+	Difference
Height	178.5 mm	164 mm	+14.5 mm
Width	83.5 mm	75.8 mm	+7.7 mm
Thickness	10.5 mm	6 mm	+4.5 mm
Weight	265 g	155 g	+110 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade GT Play better than Hot 60 Pro+?

5GYes · Hot 60 Pro+: No
Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+12%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Hot 60 Pro+: No
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%

Why is Hot 60 Pro+ better than Blade GT Play?

Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
OLED panelNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
Weight265 g vs 155 g+71%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Pixel density392 ppi vs 440 ppi+12%
Thickness10.5 mm vs 6 mm+75%
Screen-to-body ratio73.1% vs 89.3%+22%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Doogee Blade GT Play≈ $3507.4	Infinix Hot 60 Pro+7.2
Design
Weight	265 g	155 g
Thickness	10.5 mm	6 mm
Height	178.5 mm	164 mm
Width	83.5 mm	75.8 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP65
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx5
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Black, Silver	Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,720 px
Pixel density	392 ppi	440 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	—	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,650 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.1%	89.3%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7025	Mediatek Helio G200
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	446,336
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,945
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	380
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	1	1
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	16 MP	13 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,800 mAh	5,160 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.2 h
Wired charging	18 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	68%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	XOS 15.1
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	E	—
Battery charge cycles	1,400	—
Endurance per cycle	36 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—