- android.gs
- Compare
- Blade 10 Ultra Energy vs Galaxy F17
Doogee Blade 10 Ultra Energy vs Samsung Galaxy F17
What Blade 10 Ultra Energy does better (5) and where Galaxy F17 wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Display7.3
5.4Camera7.8
7.3Battery5.3
7.3Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade 10 Ultra EnergyGalaxy F17
| Blade 10 Ultra Energy | Galaxy F17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.7 mm | 164.4 mm | +8.3 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 77.9 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 7.5 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Weight | 295 g | 192 g | +103 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade 10 Ultra Energy better than Galaxy F17?
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+23%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Why is Galaxy F17 better than Blade 10 Ultra Energy?
- OLED panelNo · Blade 10 Ultra Energy: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Blade 10 Ultra Energy: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Weight295 g vs 192 g+54%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 385 ppi+43%
- Process12 nm vs 5 nm2.4×
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Blade 10 Ultra Energy: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 295 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 172.7 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Natural Color, Black | Black, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.8% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Exynos |
| Process | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 571,738 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,242 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 47% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.64 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
