android.gs
Compare
Blade 10 Pro Energy vs Galaxy A26

Doogee Blade 10 Pro Energy vs Samsung Galaxy A26

What Blade 10 Pro Energy does better (7) and where Galaxy A26 wins (20) — every spec side by side.

Doogee · 2025Blade 10 Pro Energy

6.7Score

7 advantages≈ $230

Samsung · 2025Galaxy A26

7.5Score

20 advantages≈ $225

Higher score

4.7Display7.5

4.6Camera8.0

7.3Battery3.2

7.3Features8.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade 10 Pro EnergyGalaxy A26

	Blade 10 Pro Energy	Galaxy A26	Difference
Height	172.7 mm	164 mm	+8.7 mm
Width	80 mm	77.5 mm	+2.5 mm
Thickness	10.7 mm	7.7 mm	+3 mm
Weight	295 g	200 g	+95 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade 10 Pro Energy better than Galaxy A26?

Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+23%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Energy classB vs C
Repairability classB vs C
Drop resistance classA vs B
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Endurance per cycle51 h vs 37 h+37%

Why is Galaxy A26 better than Blade 10 Pro Energy?

OLED panelNo · Blade 10 Pro Energy: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · Blade 10 Pro Energy: Yes
Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
Weight295 g vs 200 g+48%
Pixel density269 ppi vs 385 ppi+43%
Process12 nm vs 5 nm2.4×
CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Blade 10 Pro Energy: Yes
Max video1080p vs 4K

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Doogee Blade 10 Pro Energy≈ $2306.7	Samsung Galaxy A26≈ $2257.5
Design
Weight	295 g	200 g
Thickness	10.7 mm	7.7 mm
Height	172.7 mm	164 mm
Width	80 mm	77.5 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP67
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx7
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black, Red/Silver, Gray/Black, Tarnish	Black, White, Mint, Peach Pink
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,612 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	269 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	800 nits
Measured brightness	—	777 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	74.8%	86.7%
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc T7250	Exynos 1380 - Global
Chip maker	Unisoc	Exynos
Process	12 nm	5 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MP1	Mali-G68 MP5 - Global Mali-G68 - LATAM
AnTuTu score	—	579,811
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	2,768
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	794
Memory
RAM	6 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	8 MP	13 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	6,150 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	10.7 h
Wired charging	18 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	51%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-27.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	—	Side
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.41 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 8.5
Major OS updates promised	—	6
EU label
Energy class	B	C
Battery charge cycles	1,000	1,200
Endurance per cycle	51 h	37 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	A	B