- android.gs
- Compare
- Blade 10 Energy vs Poco M7
Doogee Blade 10 Energy vs Xiaomi Poco M7
What Blade 10 Energy does better (4) and where Poco M7 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Display5.9
3.7Camera4.6
6.4Battery6.3
7.3Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade 10 EnergyPoco M7
| Blade 10 Energy | Poco M7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.7 mm | 171.9 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 77.8 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.2 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Weight | 295 g | 205 g | +90 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade 10 Energy better than Poco M7?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- NFCYes · Poco M7: No
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+19%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 260 ppi+3%
Why is Poco M7 better than Blade 10 Energy?
- Main camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- Stereo speakersNo · Blade 10 Energy: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
- Weight295 g vs 205 g+44%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Blade 10 Energy: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
- Thickness10.7 mm vs 8.2 mm+30%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 295 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 172.7 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Green, Red, Red/Blue | Ocean Blue, Satin Black, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.8% | 84% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 539,456 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,115 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
