- android.gs
- Compare
- X50 vs Galaxy A72
Cubot X50 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
What X50 does better (0) and where Galaxy A72 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Display7.1
7.7Camera9.2
6.4Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X50Galaxy A72
| X50 | Galaxy A72 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.8 mm | 165 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 203 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X50 better than Galaxy A72?
X50 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Galaxy A72 better than X50?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · X50: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · X50: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · X50: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X50: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- 4K selfie videoNo · X50: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Weight213 g vs 203 g+5%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 166.8 mm | 165 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 825 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 84.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V/CA Helio P60 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 279,342 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,483 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 313 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | microUSB | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.23 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | upgradable to Android 14 One UI 6.1 |
