- android.gs
- Compare
- P90 vs Galaxy A17
Cubot P90 vs Samsung Galaxy A17
What P90 does better (8) and where Galaxy A17 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Display7.0
7.3Camera7.8
6.2Battery3.9
4.5Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
P90Galaxy A17
| P90 | Galaxy A17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.3 mm | 164.4 mm | +7.9 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 77.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 192 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P90 better than Galaxy A17?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Repairability classB vs C
- Drop resistance classA vs B
- Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Battery charge cycles1,300 vs 1,200+8%
Why is Galaxy A17 better than P90?
- OLED panelNo · P90: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · P90: Yes
- 5GNo · P90: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 385 ppi+48%
- eSIMNo · P90: Yes
- Energy classD vs B
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Weight209 g vs 192 g+9%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Endurance per cycle38 h vs 44 h+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 172.3 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Purple | Black, Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,640 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 738 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 435,787 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,048 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 365 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.67 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | 38 h | 44 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | B |
