- android.gs
- Compare
- P90 vs Hot 60 Pro+
Cubot P90 vs Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
What P90 does better (6) and where Hot 60 Pro+ wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Display9.8
7.3Camera5.3
6.2Battery5.4
4.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
P90Hot 60 Pro+
| P90 | Hot 60 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.3 mm | 164 mm | +8.3 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 75.8 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 6 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 155 g | +54 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P90 better than Hot 60 Pro+?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Memory card slotYes · Hot 60 Pro+: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Hot 60 Pro+: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
Why is Hot 60 Pro+ better than P90?
- Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
- OLED panelNo · P90: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · P90: Yes
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 440 ppi+69%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Weight209 g vs 155 g+35%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,224 px+70%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 6 mm+43%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.5% vs 89.3%+7%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 155 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 172.3 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Purple | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,640 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,650 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 89.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 446,336 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,945 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 380 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.2 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 68% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | XOS 15.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 38 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
