- android.gs
- Compare
- Max 5 vs Ace 5
Cubot Max 5 vs OnePlus Ace 5
What Max 5 does better (5) and where Ace 5 wins (22) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Max 5Ace 5
| Max 5 | Ace 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.9 mm | 161.7 mm | +12.2 mm |
| Width | 78.9 mm | 75.8 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.1 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 223 g | 206 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Max 5 better than Ace 5?
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size7″ vs 6.8″+3%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Why is Ace 5 better than Max 5?
- AnTuTu score1,171,088 vs 2,324,192+98%
- Wired charging33 W vs 80 W2.4×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 4,500 nits9×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,810 vs 6,318+66%
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 6,415 mAh+26%
- OLED panelNo · Max 5: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Max 5: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Max 5: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 110%2.2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 223 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 173.9 mm | 161.7 mm |
| Width | 78.9 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Crystal Shield Glass |
| Colours | Tech Black, Pearl White | Gray, White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,264 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,780 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6% | 91.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,171,088 | 2,324,192 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,810 | 6,318 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,597 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.8" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 6,415 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 110% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 900 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 30 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
