android.gs
Compare
KingKong X vs Galaxy A55

Cubot KingKong X vs Samsung Galaxy A55

What KingKong X does better (9) and where Galaxy A55 wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2024KingKong X

8.2Score

9 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

Samsung · 2024Galaxy A55

8.1Score

13 advantages≈ $270

6.7Display7.4

6.9Camera8.3

8.6Battery5.0

8.2Features8.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

KingKong XGalaxy A55

	KingKong X	Galaxy A55	Difference
Height	170.9 mm	161.1 mm	+9.8 mm
Width	82.2 mm	77.4 mm	+4.8 mm
Thickness	18.7 mm	8.2 mm	+10.5 mm
Weight	388 g	213 g	+175 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KingKong X better than Galaxy A55?

Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2×
Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A55: No
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Pixel density401 ppi vs 390 ppi+3%

Why is Galaxy A55 better than KingKong X?

OLED panelNo · KingKong X: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong X: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · KingKong X: Yes
Weight388 g vs 213 g+82%
Thickness18.7 mm vs 8.2 mm2.3×
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong X: Yes
4K selfie videoNo · KingKong X: Yes
eSIMNo · KingKong X: Yes
CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+6%
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Screen-to-body ratio74.2% vs 85.8%+16%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot KingKong X≈ $3008.2	Samsung Galaxy A55≈ $2708.1
Design
Weight	388 g	213 g
Thickness	18.7 mm	8.2 mm
Height	170.9 mm	161.1 mm
Width	82.2 mm	77.4 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP67
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx7
Glass protection	Panda Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black	Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.6″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,408 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	401 ppi	390 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,010 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	74.2%	85.8%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7050	Exynos 1480
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.6 GHz	2.75 GHz
GPU	Mali-G68 MC4	Xclipse 530
AnTuTu score	—	635,598
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	3,259
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,024
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	100 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,200 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	13.4 h
Wired charging	33 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	55%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.1	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.68 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 8.5
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	G	—
Battery charge cycles	1,400	—
Endurance per cycle	16 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—