- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong X Pro vs Redmi K80
Cubot KingKong X Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K80
What KingKong X Pro does better (6) and where Redmi K80 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display9.1
7.0Camera9.0
8.6Battery9.3
8.2Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong X ProRedmi K80
| KingKong X Pro | Redmi K80 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 175.9 mm | 160.3 mm | +15.6 mm |
| Width | 83.3 mm | 75 mm | +8.3 mm |
| Thickness | 18.4 mm | 8.1 mm | +10.3 mm |
| Weight | 392 g | 206 g | +186 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong X Pro better than Redmi K80?
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 6,550 mAh+56%
- RAM24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K80: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Why is Redmi K80 better than KingKong X Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 90 W2.7×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
- Weight392 g vs 206 g+90%
- Pixel density392 ppi vs 526 ppi+34%
- Thickness18.4 mm vs 8.1 mm2.3×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+6%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 392 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 18.4 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 175.9 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 83.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black | Black, White, Mint, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.4% | 89.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,277,927 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,524 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,262 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,200 mAh | 6,550 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 89 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |








