android.gs
Compare
KingKong X Pro vs Poco X6 Pro

Cubot KingKong X Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro

What KingKong X Pro does better (7) and where Poco X6 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2024KingKong X Pro

8.4Score

7 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Poco X6 Pro

8.4Score

12 advantages≈ $360

7.4Display8.6

7.0Camera8.4

8.6Battery5.3

8.2Features6.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

KingKong X ProPoco X6 Pro

	KingKong X Pro	Poco X6 Pro	Difference
Height	175.9 mm	160.5 mm	+15.4 mm
Width	83.3 mm	74.3 mm	+9 mm
Thickness	18.4 mm	8.3 mm	+10.1 mm
Weight	392 g	186 g	+206 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KingKong X Pro better than Poco X6 Pro?

Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2×
RAM24 GB vs 12 GB2×
Main camera100 MP vs 64 MP+56%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Memory card slotYes · Poco X6 Pro: No
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×

Why is Poco X6 Pro better than KingKong X Pro?

Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
Weight392 g vs 186 g2.1×
OLED panelNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
Thickness18.4 mm vs 8.3 mm2.2×
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
Pixel density392 ppi vs 446 ppi+14%
CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+8%
Screen-to-body ratio74.4% vs 90.1%+21%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,220 px+13%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot KingKong X Pro≈ $3808.4	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro≈ $3608.4
Design
Weight	392 g	186 g
Thickness	18.4 mm	8.3 mm
Height	175.9 mm	160.5 mm
Width	83.3 mm	74.3 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Panda Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black	Black, Yellow, Gray
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	392 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,148 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	74.4%	90.1%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8200	Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.1 GHz	3.35 GHz
GPU	Mali-G610 MC6	Mali G615-MC6
AnTuTu score	—	1,396,547
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	4,696
Memory
RAM	24 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	100 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.7
Main sensor size	—	1/2.0"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	—	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,200 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.8 h
Wired charging	33 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	—	67%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	C	—
Battery charge cycles	1,400	—
Endurance per cycle	89 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—