How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. KingKong X Pro vs Poco F6

Cubot KingKong X Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F6

What KingKong X Pro does better (8) and where Poco F6 wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Cubot KingKong X Pro
Cubot · 2024KingKong X Pro
8.4Score
8 advantages≈ $380
vs
Xiaomi Poco F6
Xiaomi · 2024Poco F6
8.6Score
12 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
7.4Display8.8
7.0Camera8.8
8.6Battery4.9
8.2Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

KingKong X ProPoco F6
83.3 × 175.918.474.5 × 160.58
KingKong X ProPoco F6Difference
Height175.9 mm160.5 mm+15.4 mm
Width83.3 mm74.5 mm+8.8 mm
Thickness18.4 mm8 mm+10.4 mm
Weight392 g179 g+213 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KingKong X Pro better than Poco F6?

  1. Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2×
  2. RAM24 GB vs 12 GB2×
  3. Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
  4. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  5. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  6. Memory card slotYes · Poco F6: No
  7. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz+3%
  8. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%

Why is Poco F6 better than KingKong X Pro?

  1. Wired charging33 W vs 90 W2.7×
  2. Weight392 g vs 179 g2.2×
  3. OLED panelNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
  4. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  5. Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
  6. Stereo speakersNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
  7. Thickness18.4 mm vs 8 mm2.3×
  8. Rear cameras1 vs 22×
  9. Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
  10. Pixel density392 ppi vs 446 ppi+14%
  11. Screen-to-body ratio74.4% vs 89.8%+21%
  12. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,220 px+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco F6Xiaomi Poco F6≈ $4108.6
Design
Weight392 g179 g
Thickness18.4 mm8 mm
Height175.9 mm160.5 mm
Width83.3 mm74.5 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP64
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionPanda GlassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursBlackBlack, Green, Titanium
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelIPS LCDAMOLED
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,220 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,712 px
Pixel density392 ppi446 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—2,400 nits
Measured brightness—1,218 nits
Screen-to-body ratio74.4%89.8%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8200Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz3 GHz
GPUMali-G610 MC6Adreno 735
AnTuTu score—1,497,886
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,883
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—3,110
Memory
RAM24 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera100 MP50 MP
Main camera aperture—f/1.6
Main sensor size—1/1.95"
Rear cameras12
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video—4K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity10,200 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—10.6 h
Wired charging33 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—86%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS
Major OS updates promised—3
EU label
Energy classC—
Battery charge cycles1,400—
Endurance per cycle89 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare