- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong X Pro vs Camon 30 Pro
Cubot KingKong X Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro
What KingKong X Pro does better (5) and where Camon 30 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display9.5
7.0Camera9.1
8.6Battery7.2
8.2Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong X ProCamon 30 Pro
| KingKong X Pro | Camon 30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 175.9 mm | 164 mm | +11.9 mm |
| Width | 83.3 mm | 74.5 mm | +8.8 mm |
| Thickness | 18.4 mm | 7.7 mm | +10.7 mm |
| Weight | 392 g | 189 g | +203 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong X Pro better than Camon 30 Pro?
- Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2×
- RAM24 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Camon 30 Pro better than KingKong X Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 70 W2.1×
- Weight392 g vs 189 g2.1×
- OLED panelNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
- Thickness18.4 mm vs 7.7 mm2.4×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong X Pro: Yes
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Screen-to-body ratio74.4% vs 89.9%+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 392 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 18.4 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 175.9 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 83.3 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | — |
| Colours | Black | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 998 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.4% | 89.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 949,357 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,931 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,727 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 89 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
