android.gs
Compare
KingKong ES Pro vs Galaxy A27

Cubot KingKong ES Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A27

What KingKong ES Pro does better (4) and where Galaxy A27 wins (23) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2026KingKong ES Pro

5.6Score

4 advantages

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A27

7.9Score

23 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

3.9Display8.2

6.4Camera7.9

4.9Battery4.3

4.4Features7.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

KingKong ES ProGalaxy A27

	KingKong ES Pro	Galaxy A27	Difference
Height	172.6 mm	162.4 mm	+10.2 mm
Width	81.2 mm	78.2 mm	+3 mm
Thickness	12.8 mm	7.8 mm	+5 mm
Weight	268 g	200 g	+68 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KingKong ES Pro better than Galaxy A27?

Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Repairability classB vs C
Selfie camera16 MP vs 12 MP+33%

Why is Galaxy A27 better than KingKong ES Pro?

Wired charging10 W vs 25 W2.5×
Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,400 nits3.1×
OLED panelNo · KingKong ES Pro: Yes
Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong ES Pro: Yes
5GNo · KingKong ES Pro: Yes
NFCNo · KingKong ES Pro: Yes
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
Pixel density269 ppi vs 385 ppi+43%
Weight268 g vs 200 g+34%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot KingKong ES Pro5.6	Samsung Galaxy A27≈ $2907.9
Design
Weight	268 g	200 g
Thickness	12.8 mm	7.8 mm
Height	172.6 mm	162.4 mm
Width	81.2 mm	78.2 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Panda Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black/Orange	Black, Blue, Light Green, Light Pink
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,612 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	269 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	450 nits	1,400 nits
Measured brightness	—	800 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.8%	86.8%
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc Tiger T616	Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Chip maker	Unisoc	Qualcomm
Process	12 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MP1	Adreno 710
AnTuTu score	—	694,659
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	2,973
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	911
Memory
RAM	6 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	—	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,100 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	12.7 h
Wired charging	10 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	45%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.2	5.1
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.78 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	6
EU label
Energy class	B	A
Battery charge cycles	1,000	1,200
Endurance per cycle	50 h	51 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	B	B