- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong ES Pro vs Galaxy A08 4G
Cubot KingKong ES Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A08 4G
What KingKong ES Pro does better (6) and where Galaxy A08 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.9Display4.2
6.4Camera4.6
4.9Battery7.5
4.4Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong ES ProGalaxy A08 4G
| KingKong ES Pro | Galaxy A08 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.6 mm | 167.4 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 77.4 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 8 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Weight | 268 g | 197 g | +71 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong ES Pro better than Galaxy A08 4G?
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 262 ppi+3%
Why is Galaxy A08 4G better than KingKong ES Pro?
- Wired charging10 W vs 25 W2.5×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+18%
- Weight268 g vs 197 g+36%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · KingKong ES Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Thickness12.8 mm vs 8 mm+60%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.8% vs 83.6%+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 268 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 172.6 mm | 167.4 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | — |
| Colours | Black/Orange | Navy Blue, Silver, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.8% | 83.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 503,026 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,070 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.75 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 17 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 50 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
