android.gs
Compare
KingKong ES 3 vs Redmi Note 14 4G

Cubot KingKong ES 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G

What KingKong ES 3 does better (5) and where Redmi Note 14 4G wins (18) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2025KingKong ES 3

7.0Score

5 advantages≈ $170

Xiaomi · 2025Redmi Note 14 4G

7.3Score

18 advantages≈ $175

Higher score

4.6Display8.4

5.2Camera6.4

8.6Battery6.5

6.0Features5.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

KingKong ES 3Redmi Note 14 4G

	KingKong ES 3	Redmi Note 14 4G	Difference
Height	177.4 mm	163.3 mm	+14.1 mm
Width	83.7 mm	76.6 mm	+7.1 mm
Thickness	15.3 mm	8.2 mm	+7.1 mm
Weight	352 g	196 g	+156 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KingKong ES 3 better than Redmi Note 14 4G?

Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+85%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Drop resistance classC vs D
Endurance per cycle61 h vs 49 h+25%

Why is Redmi Note 14 4G better than KingKong ES 3?

Main camera48 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,800 nits3.6×
OLED panelNo · KingKong ES 3: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · KingKong ES 3: Yes
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
Weight352 g vs 196 g+79%
Pixel density260 ppi vs 395 ppi+52%
CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · KingKong ES 3: Yes
Energy classE vs B

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot KingKong ES 3≈ $1707.0	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G≈ $1757.3
Design
Weight	352 g	196 g
Thickness	15.3 mm	8.2 mm
Height	177.4 mm	163.3 mm
Width	83.7 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black	Midnight Black, Mist Purple, Ocean Blue, Lime Green
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,600 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	260 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,303 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	74.1%	85.9%
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc T615	Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra
Chip maker	Unisoc	MediaTek
Process	12 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	1.8 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MP1	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	570,767
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,926
Memory
RAM	6 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	48 MP	108 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.7
Main sensor size	—	1/1.67"
Rear cameras	1	1
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	—	1080p
Selfie camera	16 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,200 mAh	5,500 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	12.8 h
Wired charging	33 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	—	38%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	—	Under display
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
SAR (head)	—	1 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	E	B
Battery charge cycles	1,300	1,600
Endurance per cycle	61 h	49 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	C	D