- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong ES 3 vs Moto G Play (2026)
Cubot KingKong ES 3 vs Motorola Moto G Play (2026)
What KingKong ES 3 does better (7) and where Moto G Play (2026) wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Display6.2
5.2Camera3.8
8.6Battery7.7
6.0Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong ES 3Moto G Play (2026)
| KingKong ES 3 | Moto G Play (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 177.4 mm | 167.2 mm | +10.2 mm |
| Width | 83.7 mm | 76.4 mm | +7.3 mm |
| Thickness | 15.3 mm | 8.5 mm | +6.8 mm |
| Weight | 352 g | 202 g | +150 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong ES 3 better than Moto G Play (2026)?
- Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+96%
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Main camera48 MP vs 32 MP+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
Why is Moto G Play (2026) better than KingKong ES 3?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
- 5GNo · KingKong ES 3: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong ES 3: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Weight352 g vs 202 g+74%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- eSIMNo · KingKong ES 3: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · KingKong ES 3: Yes
- Thickness15.3 mm vs 8.5 mm+80%
- Screen-to-body ratio74.1% vs 84.7%+14%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 352 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 15.3 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 177.4 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 83.7 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black | Pantone Tapestry |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 920 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.1% | 84.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 402,175 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,074 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 384 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 17.4 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -21 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 61 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
