android.gs
Compare
KingKong Dura vs Galaxy A27

Cubot KingKong Dura vs Samsung Galaxy A27

What KingKong Dura does better (5) and where Galaxy A27 wins (18) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2026KingKong Dura

6.7Score

5 advantages

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A27

7.9Score

18 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

6.6Display8.2

6.4Camera7.9

4.6Battery4.3

6.0Features7.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

KingKong DuraGalaxy A27

	KingKong Dura	Galaxy A27	Difference
Height	180.1 mm	162.4 mm	+17.7 mm
Width	85 mm	78.2 mm	+6.8 mm
Thickness	13 mm	7.8 mm	+5.2 mm
Weight	300 g	200 g	+100 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KingKong Dura better than Galaxy A27?

Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Repairability classB vs C
Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 12 MP+33%

Why is Galaxy A27 better than KingKong Dura?

OLED panelNo · KingKong Dura: Yes
Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong Dura: Yes
5GNo · KingKong Dura: Yes
Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
Weight300 g vs 200 g+50%
Pixel density260 ppi vs 385 ppi+48%
Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong Dura: Yes
eSIMNo · KingKong Dura: Yes
Energy classB vs A

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot KingKong Dura6.7	Samsung Galaxy A27≈ $2907.9
Design
Weight	300 g	200 g
Thickness	13 mm	7.8 mm
Height	180.1 mm	162.4 mm
Width	85 mm	78.2 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Panda Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Grey, Orange, Yellow, Green	Black, Blue, Light Green, Light Pink
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,640 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	260 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,400 nits
Measured brightness	—	800 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.4%	86.8%
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc T620	Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Chip maker	Unisoc	Qualcomm
Process	12 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MP1 @850 MHz	Adreno 710
AnTuTu score	—	694,659
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	2,973
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	911
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	—	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	12.7 h
Wired charging	18 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	45%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.78 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	6
EU label
Energy class	B	A
Battery charge cycles	1,000	1,200
Endurance per cycle	45 h	51 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	B	B