- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong AX vs Zero 40 4G
Cubot KingKong AX vs Infinix Zero 40 4G
What KingKong AX does better (4) and where Zero 40 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display8.4
7.0Camera8.8
7.1Battery6.8
6.0Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong AXZero 40 4G
| KingKong AX | Zero 40 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172 mm | 164.3 mm | +7.7 mm |
| Width | 80.9 mm | 74.6 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 7.7 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 296 g | 180 g | +116 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong AX better than Zero 40 4G?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Memory card slotYes · Zero 40 4G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Zero 40 4G: No
Why is Zero 40 4G better than KingKong AX?
- OLED panelNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Weight296 g vs 180 g+64%
- Main camera100 MP vs 108 MP+8%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Thickness12.7 mm vs 7.7 mm+65%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Screen-to-body ratio75% vs 89.7%+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 296 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 172 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 80.9 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Misty Aqua, Rock Black, Blossom Glow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75% | 89.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,555 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,951 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 60% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | XOS 14.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 900 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 30 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
