- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong Ace 3 vs Xperia 10 VI
Cubot KingKong Ace 3 vs Sony Xperia 10 VI
What KingKong Ace 3 does better (8) and where Xperia 10 VI wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Display6.4
7.0Camera7.5
7.1Battery5.7
6.0Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong Ace 3Xperia 10 VI
| KingKong Ace 3 | Xperia 10 VI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.9 mm | 155 mm | +18.9 mm |
| Width | 81.8 mm | 68 mm | +13.8 mm |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 8.3 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Weight | 284 g | 164 g | +120 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong Ace 3 better than Xperia 10 VI?
- Main camera100 MP vs 48 MP2.1×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.1″+8%
Why is Xperia 10 VI better than KingKong Ace 3?
- OLED panelNo · KingKong Ace 3: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong Ace 3: Yes
- 5GNo · KingKong Ace 3: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong Ace 3: Yes
- Weight284 g vs 164 g+73%
- Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong Ace 3: Yes
- eSIMNo · KingKong Ace 3: Yes
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 449 ppi+12%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Thickness12.7 mm vs 8.3 mm+53%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 284 g | 164 g |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 173.9 mm | 155 mm |
| Width | 81.8 mm | 68 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black/Orange | Blue, Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,010 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.3% | 82.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G88 | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 490,025 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,769 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 613 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.9 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 36% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
