- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong 9 vs 13T
Cubot KingKong 9 vs Xiaomi 13T
What KingKong 9 does better (5) and where 13T wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display9.4
7.0Camera8.2
8.6Battery5.7
7.3Features9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong 913T
| KingKong 9 | 13T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172 mm | 162.2 mm | +9.8 mm |
| Width | 81.6 mm | 75.7 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8.5 mm | +9.2 mm |
| Weight | 390 g | 193 g | +197 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong 9 better than 13T?
- Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.1×
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- Memory card slotYes · 13T: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · 13T: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Why is 13T better than KingKong 9?
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- Weight390 g vs 193 g2×
- OLED panelNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- Thickness17.7 mm vs 8.5 mm2.1×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- eSIMNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 446 ppi+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 390 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 172 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 81.6 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,264 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.3% | 87.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 825,858 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,755 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.28" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.4 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 91 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
