- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong 9 vs V29
Cubot KingKong 9 vs Vivo V29
What KingKong 9 does better (5) and where V29 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display8.8
7.0Camera8.5
8.6Battery6.3
7.3Features7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong 9V29
| KingKong 9 | V29 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172 mm | 164.2 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Width | 81.6 mm | 74.4 mm | +7.2 mm |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 7.5 mm | +10.2 mm |
| Weight | 390 g | 186 g | +204 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong 9 better than V29?
- Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 4,600 mAh2.3×
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · V29: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · V29: No
Why is V29 better than KingKong 9?
- Wired charging33 W vs 80 W2.4×
- Weight390 g vs 186 g2.1×
- OLED panelNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Thickness17.7 mm vs 7.5 mm2.4×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- eSIMNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 453 ppi+13%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 390 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 172 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 81.6 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black | Space Black, Himalayan Blue, Purple Fairy, Majestic Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 996 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.3% | 90.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 544,639 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,797 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,600 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 88% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.94 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 91 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
