- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong 8 vs Galaxy A54
Cubot KingKong 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A54
What KingKong 8 does better (5) and where Galaxy A54 wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Display7.4
5.2Camera8.3
9.5Battery3.2
6.0Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong 8Galaxy A54
| KingKong 8 | Galaxy A54 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.9 mm | 158.2 mm | +11.7 mm |
| Width | 80.2 mm | 76.7 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 8.2 mm | +11.8 mm |
| Weight | 382 g | 202 g | +180 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong 8 better than Galaxy A54?
- Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.1×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A54: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is Galaxy A54 better than KingKong 8?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- OLED panelNo · KingKong 8: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong 8: Yes
- 5GNo · KingKong 8: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong 8: Yes
- Weight382 g vs 202 g+89%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 403 ppi+49%
- Thickness20 mm vs 8.2 mm2.4×
- Process12 nm vs 5 nm2.4×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong 8: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 382 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 169.9 mm | 158.2 mm |
| Width | 80.2 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Red, Green | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 980 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.2% | 82.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788V/WA | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 506,678 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,703 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 808 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.2 h |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.69 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
