- android.gs
- Compare
- C20 vs Redmi Note 9 Pro (India)
Cubot C20 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (India)
What C20 does better (2) and where Redmi Note 9 Pro (India) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display3.9
3.2Camera6.5
5.6Features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
C20Redmi Note 9 Pro (India)
| C20 | Redmi Note 9 Pro (India) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 155 mm | 165.8 mm | −10.8 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.7 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 8.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 209 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C20 better than Redmi Note 9 Pro (India)?
- NFCYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro (India): No
- Weight193 g vs 209 g+8%
Why is Redmi Note 9 Pro (India) better than C20?
- Main camera12 MP vs 48 MP4×
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+20%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · C20: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Screen size6.2″ vs 6.7″+8%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 155 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Blue, Black | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.2″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,246 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio P22 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 254,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,785 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.9 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 |
