- android.gs
- Compare
- Core-M6 vs Moto G67 Power
Crosscall Core-M6 vs Motorola Moto G67 Power
What Core-M6 does better (3) and where Moto G67 Power wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display6.8
3.9Camera7.1
3.8Battery8.1
8.6Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Core-M6Moto G67 Power
| Core-M6 | Moto G67 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.8 mm | 166.2 mm | +6.6 mm |
| Width | 81.5 mm | 76.5 mm | +5 mm |
| Thickness | 13.9 mm | 8.6 mm | +5.3 mm |
| Weight | 260 g | 210 g | +50 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Core-M6 better than Moto G67 Power?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Memory card slotYes · Moto G67 Power: No
- eSIMYes · Moto G67 Power: No
Why is Moto G67 Power better than Core-M6?
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,950 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+41%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,050 nits2.3×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Core-M6: Yes
- Pixel density215 ppi vs 391 ppi+82%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Weight260 g vs 210 g+24%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Core-M6: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 260 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 13.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 172.8 mm | 166.2 mm |
| Width | 81.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black | Pantone: Cilantro, Parachute Purple, Blue Curacao |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 576 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,152 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 215 ppi | 391 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,050 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 65.7% | 86.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 848,362 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,988 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,950 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | — | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 80 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
