- android.gs
- Compare
- Cool 20s vs Galaxy XCover6 Pro
Coolpad Cool 20s vs Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
What Cool 20s does better (7) and where Galaxy XCover6 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Display5.8
4.6Camera6.7
3.0Battery3.0
6.2Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cool 20sGalaxy XCover6 Pro
| Cool 20s | Galaxy XCover6 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 168.8 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 79.9 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.9 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 235 g | −55 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cool 20s better than Galaxy XCover6 Pro?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy XCover6 Pro: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,050 mAh+11%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Weight180 g vs 235 g+31%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9.9 mm+19%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.5% vs 77.8%+10%
Why is Galaxy XCover6 Pro better than Cool 20s?
- NFCNo · Cool 20s: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Cool 20s: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 235 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 168.8 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 79.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 493 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 77.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 697,431 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,842 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.48 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Cool UI 2.0 | One UI 8.0 |
