- android.gs
- Compare
- Cool 20 Pro vs Galaxy A52s 5G
Coolpad Cool 20 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
What Cool 20 Pro does better (1) and where Galaxy A52s 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display7.4
5.8Camera8.7
4.2Battery3.2
6.6Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cool 20 ProGalaxy A52s 5G
| Cool 20 Pro | Galaxy A52s 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 159.9 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 189 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cool 20 Pro better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than Cool 20 Pro?
- OLED panelNo · Cool 20 Pro: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Cool 20 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Cool 20 Pro: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Cool 20 Pro: Yes
- Weight193 g vs 189 g+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White, Gold | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8% | 84.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 429,675 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 11,060 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 685 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.88 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Cool UI 2.0 | One UI 6 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A05svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.87.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A327.75.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A04svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23vsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G8.57.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G7.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 127.76.4

