- android.gs
- Compare
- C35 vs Galaxy A26
Coolpad C35 vs Samsung Galaxy A26
What C35 does better (1) and where Galaxy A26 wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display7.5
4.6Camera8.0
4.6Battery3.2
3.9Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
C35Galaxy A26
| C35 | Galaxy A26 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.4 mm | 164 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 200 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C35 better than Galaxy A26?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A26: No
Why is Galaxy A26 better than C35?
- OLED panelNo · C35: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · C35: Yes
- NFCNo · C35: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Peak brightness430 nits vs 800 nits+86%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 385 ppi+48%
- Process12 nm vs 5 nm2.4×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · C35: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- eSIMNo · C35: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 167.4 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Flowing Silver, Radiant Purple, Brilliant Gold | Black, White, Mint, Peach Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 430 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 86.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 | Exynos 1380 - Global |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 - Global Mali-G68 - LATAM |
| AnTuTu score | — | 579,811 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,768 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 794 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.7 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 51% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | C |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 37 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
