How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. S75 vs Moto G54 Power

Caterpillar S75 vs Motorola Moto G54 Power

What S75 does better (3) and where Moto G54 Power wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Caterpillar S75
Caterpillar · 2023S75
7.2Score
3 advantages≈ $540
vs
Motorola Moto G54 Power
Motorola · 2023Moto G54 Power
7.3Score
10 advantages≈ $530
Higher score
6.7Display5.8
5.8Camera8.0
6.6Battery7.3
6.6Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

S75Moto G54 Power
80 × 17111.973.8 × 161.68.9
S75Moto G54 PowerDifference
Height171 mm161.6 mm+9.4 mm
Width80 mm73.8 mm+6.2 mm
Thickness11.9 mm8.9 mm+3 mm
Weight268 g192 g+76 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is S75 better than Moto G54 Power?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
  2. Wireless chargingYes · Moto G54 Power: No
  3. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is Moto G54 Power better than S75?

  1. RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
  2. Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Optical stabilisationNo · S75: Yes
  4. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
  5. Weight268 g vs 192 g+40%
  6. Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
  7. eSIMNo · S75: Yes
  8. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · S75: Yes
  9. Thickness11.9 mm vs 8.9 mm+34%
  10. Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Caterpillar S75Caterpillar S75≈ $5407.2
Design
Weight268 g192 g
Thickness11.9 mm8.9 mm
Height171 mm161.6 mm
Width80 mm73.8 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackPlasticPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP52
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx2
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursBlackMidnight Blue, Pearl Blue, Mint Green
Display
Screen size6.6″6.5″
PanelLCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,408 px2,400 px
Pixel density400 ppi405 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—560 nits
Measured brightness—489 nits
Screen-to-body ratio—85.5%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930Mediatek Dimensity 7020
Chip makerMediatekMediaTek
Process—6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUIMG BXM-8-256IMG BXM-8-256
AnTuTu score—432,772
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,918
Memory
RAM6 GB12 GB
Storage (max)128 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Selfie camera8 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Po
Active use (test)—13.9 h
Wired charging—33 W
Charged in 30 min—45%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.15.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorRearSide
Sensorsproximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprintFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 12Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—Hello UI
Major OS updates promised2—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare