- android.gs
- Compare
- S22 Flip vs Razr 2024
Cat S22 Flip vs Motorola Razr 2024
What S22 Flip does better (1) and where Razr 2024 wins (27) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
S22 FlipRazr 2024
| S22 Flip | Razr 2024 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 119.4 mm | 171.3 mm | −51.9 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 74 mm | −13 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 7.3 mm | +15.7 mm |
| Weight | 224 g | 188 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S22 Flip better than Razr 2024?
- Memory card slotYes · Razr 2024: No
Why is Razr 2024 better than S22 Flip?
- Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh2.1×
- RAM2 GB vs 8 GB4×
- Main camera5 MP vs 50 MP10×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Storage (max)16 GB vs 256 GB16×
- Screen size2.8″ vs 6.9″2.5×
- OLED panelNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- NFCNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · S22 Flip: Yes
- CPU frequency1.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+92%
- Thickness23 mm vs 7.3 mm3.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 224 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 119.4 mm | 171.3 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black | Koala Grey, Beach Sand, Spritz Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 480 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 286 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,288 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 33.3% | 84.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 308 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 773,565 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,900 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 2 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 59% |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
