android.gs
Compare
Shark 9 vs Redmi Note 13

Blackview Shark 9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

What Shark 9 does better (3) and where Redmi Note 13 wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Blackview · 2024Shark 9

6.5Score

3 advantages

Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Note 13

6.7Score

16 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

5.0Display7.7

5.4Camera7.1

4.6Battery3.2

8.1Features5.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Shark 9Redmi Note 13

	Shark 9	Redmi Note 13	Difference
Height	164.8 mm	161.1 mm	+3.7 mm
Width	75.6 mm	75 mm	+0.6 mm
Thickness	8.7 mm	7.6 mm	+1.1 mm
Weight	200 g	174 g	+26 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Shark 9 better than Redmi Note 13?

Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 13: No
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Max video4K vs 1080p

Why is Redmi Note 13 better than Shark 9?

Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
OLED panelNo · Shark 9: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
Pixel density264 ppi vs 395 ppi+50%
Peak brightness700 nits vs 1,000 nits+43%
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Shark 9: Yes
Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
Weight200 g vs 174 g+15%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Blackview Shark 96.5	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13≈ $2906.7
Design
Weight	200 g	174 g
Thickness	8.7 mm	7.6 mm
Height	164.8 mm	161.1 mm
Width	75.6 mm	75 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	—	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx4
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Starry Rock Black, Azure Wave Blue	Graphite black (Stealth Black), Arctic White, Ocean Teal, Prism Gold
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,604 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	264 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	700 nits	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	991 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.1%	88.9%
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc T820	Mediatek Dimensity 6080
Chip maker	Unisoc	MediaTek
Process	—	6 nm
CPU cores	—	8
CPU frequency	—	2.4 GHz
GPU	—	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	405,118
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,968
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	371
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	108 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.7
Main sensor size	—	1/1.67"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	8 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	9.8 h
Wired charging	18 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.94 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	2
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	800	—
Endurance per cycle	49 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	C	—