- android.gs
- Compare
- Shark 9 vs Spark 20 Pro+
Blackview Shark 9 vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro+
What Shark 9 does better (4) and where Spark 20 Pro+ wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display8.0
5.4Camera6.6
4.6Battery4.2
8.1Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Shark 9Spark 20 Pro+
| Shark 9 | Spark 20 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 164.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 75 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 7.6 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 179 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Shark 9 better than Spark 20 Pro+?
- 5GYes · Spark 20 Pro+: No
- Memory card slotYes · Spark 20 Pro+: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Spark 20 Pro+: No
Why is Spark 20 Pro+ better than Shark 9?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- OLED panelNo · Shark 9: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 393 ppi+49%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 1,000 nits+43%
- Weight200 g vs 179 g+12%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 7.6 mm+14%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.1% vs 89%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Starry Rock Black, Azure Wave Blue | Temporal Orbits, Lunar Frost, Radiant Starstream, Magic Skin 2.0 Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 549 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 89% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T820 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 386,262 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,787 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 347 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 14 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
