- android.gs
- Compare
- Shark 8 vs Galaxy A25
Blackview Shark 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A25
What Shark 8 does better (4) and where Galaxy A25 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display7.5
5.7Camera8.0
6.0Battery3.1
5.0Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Shark 8Galaxy A25
| Shark 8 | Galaxy A25 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.5 mm | 161 mm | +7.5 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 197 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Shark 8 better than Galaxy A25?
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
Why is Galaxy A25 better than Shark 8?
- OLED panelNo · Shark 8: Yes
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Shark 8: Yes
- 5GNo · Shark 8: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Shark 8: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Shark 8: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 168.5 mm | 161 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Galaxy Blue, Scorching Gold, Moonlight Grey | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,030 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | 84.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Exynos 1280 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 443,234 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,023 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 643 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.3 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 49% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.46 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | DokeOS 4.0 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
