- android.gs
- Compare
- Fort 5 vs Moto G Max
Blackview Fort 5 vs Motorola Moto G Max
What Fort 5 does better (8) and where Moto G Max wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display7.0
6.7Camera6.8
6.6Battery8.1
6.0Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fort 5Moto G Max
| Fort 5 | Moto G Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.4 mm | 166.2 mm | +12.2 mm |
| Width | 83 mm | 76.5 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.6 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 248 g | 213 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fort 5 better than Moto G Max?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Wireless chargingYes · Moto G Max: No
- NFCYes · Moto G Max: No
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Why is Moto G Max better than Fort 5?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- 5GNo · Fort 5: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Fort 5: Yes
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 1,050 nits+50%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Fort 5: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Fort 5: Yes
- Weight248 g vs 213 g+16%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Thickness10.7 mm vs 8.6 mm+24%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.7% vs 86.2%+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 248 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 178.4 mm | 166.2 mm |
| Width | 83 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Cyber Yellow, Warrior Black | Pantone: Alaskan Blue, Malaga (Burgundy), Stargazer (Slate) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 391 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 1,050 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.7% | 86.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno |
| AnTuTu score | — | 805,947 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,154 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | DokeOS 5.0 | Hello UI |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 500 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 48 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
