android.gs
Compare
Fort 200 vs Galaxy A37

Blackview Fort 200 vs Samsung Galaxy A37

What Fort 200 does better (8) and where Galaxy A37 wins (21) — every spec side by side.

Blackview · 2026Fort 200

7.3Score

8 advantages≈ $280

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A37

8.6Score

21 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

6.9Display8.4

6.7Camera7.9

6.6Battery6.4

6.0Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Fort 200Galaxy A37

	Fort 200	Galaxy A37	Difference
Height	178.4 mm	162.9 mm	+15.5 mm
Width	83 mm	78.2 mm	+4.8 mm
Thickness	11.5 mm	7.4 mm	+4.1 mm
Weight	268 g	196 g	+72 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fort 200 better than Galaxy A37?

Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy A37: No
Selfie camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy A37: No
Repairability classB vs C
Drop resistance classA vs B
Pixel density396 ppi vs 385 ppi+3%

Why is Galaxy A37 better than Fort 200?

Peak brightness700 nits vs 1,900 nits2.7×
OLED panelNo · Fort 200: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · Fort 200: Yes
5GNo · Fort 200: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Fort 200: Yes
Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
Battery charge cycles500 vs 1,2002.4×
Weight268 g vs 196 g+37%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+25%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Fort 200: Yes
Max video1080p vs 4K
4K selfie videoNo · Fort 200: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Blackview Fort 200≈ $2807.3	Samsung Galaxy A37≈ $2908.6
Design
Weight	268 g	196 g
Thickness	11.5 mm	7.4 mm
Height	178.4 mm	162.9 mm
Width	83 mm	78.2 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Panda Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Blaze Orange, Phantom Black	Graygreen, Charkoal, White, Light Violet
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,460 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	396 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	700 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,246 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.7%	86.5%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G100	Exynos 1480
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.75 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Xclipse 530
AnTuTu score	—	697,795
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	3,345
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,035
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	13.8 h
Wired charging	33 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	62%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.72 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	DokeOS 5.0	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	6
EU label
Energy class	B	A
Battery charge cycles	500	1,200
Endurance per cycle	48 h	53 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	A	B