android.gs
Compare
Fort 200 vs Galaxy A27

Blackview Fort 200 vs Samsung Galaxy A27

What Fort 200 does better (10) and where Galaxy A27 wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Blackview · 2026Fort 200

7.3Score

10 advantages≈ $280

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A27

7.9Score

16 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

6.9Display8.2

6.7Camera7.9

6.6Battery4.3

6.0Features7.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Fort 200Galaxy A27

	Fort 200	Galaxy A27	Difference
Height	178.4 mm	162.4 mm	+16 mm
Width	83 mm	78.2 mm	+4.8 mm
Thickness	11.5 mm	7.8 mm	+3.7 mm
Weight	268 g	200 g	+68 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fort 200 better than Galaxy A27?

Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy A27: No
Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Repairability classB vs C
Drop resistance classA vs B
Pixel density396 ppi vs 385 ppi+3%

Why is Galaxy A27 better than Fort 200?

OLED panelNo · Fort 200: Yes
Peak brightness700 nits vs 1,400 nits2×
Optical stabilisationNo · Fort 200: Yes
5GNo · Fort 200: Yes
Battery charge cycles500 vs 1,2002.4×
Weight268 g vs 200 g+34%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Fort 200: Yes
Max video1080p vs 4K
eSIMNo · Fort 200: Yes
Energy classB vs A
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Blackview Fort 200≈ $2807.3	Samsung Galaxy A27≈ $2907.9
Design
Weight	268 g	200 g
Thickness	11.5 mm	7.8 mm
Height	178.4 mm	162.4 mm
Width	83 mm	78.2 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Panda Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Blaze Orange, Phantom Black	Black, Blue, Light Green, Light Pink
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,460 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	396 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	700 nits	1,400 nits
Measured brightness	—	800 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.7%	86.8%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G100	Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Adreno 710
AnTuTu score	—	694,659
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	2,973
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	911
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	12.7 h
Wired charging	33 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	45%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.2	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.78 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	DokeOS 5.0	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	6
EU label
Energy class	B	A
Battery charge cycles	500	1,200
Endurance per cycle	48 h	51 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	A	B