- android.gs
- Compare
- BV9300 Pro vs iQOO Z9s
Blackview BV9300 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z9s
What BV9300 Pro does better (9) and where iQOO Z9s wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display8.3
7.7Camera8.1
8.7Battery7.9
6.5Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
BV9300 ProiQOO Z9s
| BV9300 Pro | iQOO Z9s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 184.6 mm | 163.7 mm | +20.9 mm |
| Width | 85.6 mm | 75 mm | +10.6 mm |
| Thickness | 22.8 mm | 7.5 mm | +15.3 mm |
| Weight | 525 g | 180 g | +345 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BV9300 Pro better than iQOO Z9s?
- Battery capacity15,080 mAh vs 5,500 mAh2.7×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- NFCYes · iQOO Z9s: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z9s: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z9s: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
Why is iQOO Z9s better than BV9300 Pro?
- Weight525 g vs 180 g2.9×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,800 nits3.6×
- OLED panelNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 44 W+33%
- Thickness22.8 mm vs 7.5 mm3×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio81% vs 90.3%+11%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 525 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 22.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 184.6 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 85.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Schott Xensation |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Titanium Matte, Onyx Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 741,427 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,908 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 15,080 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | DokeOS 4.0 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
