- android.gs
- Compare
- BV9300 Pro vs Galaxy A55
Blackview BV9300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A55
What BV9300 Pro does better (5) and where Galaxy A55 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display7.4
7.7Camera8.3
8.8Battery5.0
6.5Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
BV9300 ProGalaxy A55
| BV9300 Pro | Galaxy A55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 184.6 mm | 161.1 mm | +23.5 mm |
| Width | 85.6 mm | 77.4 mm | +8.2 mm |
| Thickness | 22.8 mm | 8.2 mm | +14.6 mm |
| Weight | 525 g | 213 g | +312 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BV9300 Pro better than Galaxy A55?
- Battery capacity15,080 mAh vs 5,000 mAh3×
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is Galaxy A55 better than BV9300 Pro?
- Weight525 g vs 213 g2.5×
- OLED panelNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- Thickness22.8 mm vs 8.2 mm2.8×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+25%
- 4K selfie videoNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio81% vs 85.8%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 525 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 22.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 184.6 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 85.6 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | — | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,010 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81% | 85.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Exynos 1480 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Exynos |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.75 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 635,598 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,259 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,024 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 15,080 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | DokeOS 4.0 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
