- android.gs
- Compare
- BV4900 Pro vs Poco F2 Pro
Blackview BV4900 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
What BV4900 Pro does better (3) and where Poco F2 Pro wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Display5.7
2.7Camera8.4
8.1Battery4.1
6.0Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
BV4900 ProPoco F2 Pro
| BV4900 Pro | Poco F2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157.5 mm | 163.3 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 75.4 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 8.9 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Weight | 261 g | 219 g | +42 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BV4900 Pro better than Poco F2 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Battery capacity5,580 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+19%
- Memory card slotYes · Poco F2 Pro: No
Why is Poco F2 Pro better than BV4900 Pro?
- Main camera13 MP vs 64 MP4.9×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · BV4900 Pro: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · BV4900 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · BV4900 Pro: Yes
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 20 MP4×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+42%
- Pixel density282 ppi vs 395 ppi+40%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · BV4900 Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 8K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 261 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 157.5 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Dragontrail Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green, Yellow | Neon Blue, Phantom White, Electric Purple, Cyber Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,440 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 282 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 854 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 68.2% | 87.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762V/WD Helio P22 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 538,221 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,332 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,104 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Max video | 1080p | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,580 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 14 |
