How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. BL9000 Pro vs iQOO 13

Blackview BL9000 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13

What BL9000 Pro does better (3) and where iQOO 13 wins (20) — every spec side by side.

Blackview BL9000 Pro
Blackview · 2024BL9000 Pro
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ $590
vs
Vivo iQOO 13
Vivo · 2024iQOO 13
9.5Score
20 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
7.2Display9.6
7.3Camera9.0
9.6Battery9.5
8.9Features9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

BL9000 ProiQOO 13
82.6 × 179.51776.7 × 163.48
BL9000 ProiQOO 13Difference
Height179.5 mm163.4 mm+16.1 mm
Width82.6 mm76.7 mm+5.9 mm
Thickness17 mm8 mm+9 mm
Weight412 g207 g+205 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BL9000 Pro better than iQOO 13?

  1. Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+43%
  2. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%

Why is iQOO 13 better than BL9000 Pro?

  1. OLED panelNo · BL9000 Pro: Yes
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  3. Optical stabilisationNo · BL9000 Pro: Yes
  4. Telephoto cameraNo · BL9000 Pro: Yes
  5. Weight412 g vs 207 g+99%
  6. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  7. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+66%
  8. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  9. Pixel density396 ppi vs 510 ppi+29%
  10. Thickness17 mm vs 8 mm2.1×
  11. Process6 nm vs 3 nm2×
  12. Max video4K vs 8K
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo iQOO 13Vivo iQOO 13≈ $6409.5
Design
Weight412 g207 g
Thickness17 mm8 mm
Height179.5 mm163.4 mm
Width82.6 mm76.7 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusSchott Xensation Alpha
ColoursSplendid Gold, Interstellar BlackAlpha (Black), Nardo Gray (Silver), White (BMW M branding), Ace Green
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelIPS LCDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelNoYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,460 px3,168 px
Pixel density396 ppi510 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,804 nits
Screen-to-body ratio73.6%90.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8020Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUMali-G77 MC9Adreno 830
AnTuTu score—2,791,585
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—9,522
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,368
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperture—f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.57"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—2×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity8,800 mAh6,150 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—18.1 h
Wired charging120 W120 W
Charged in 30 min—100%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version33.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display, ultrasonic
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceDokeOS 4.0Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles800—
Endurance per cycle87 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare