- android.gs
- Compare
- BL8800 Pro vs Galaxy S22
Blackview BL8800 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22
What BL8800 Pro does better (4) and where Galaxy S22 wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display7.8
5.8Camera9.2
8.5Battery3.2
7.6Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
BL8800 ProGalaxy S22
| BL8800 Pro | Galaxy S22 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 176.2 mm | 146 mm | +30.2 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 70.6 mm | +12.9 mm |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 7.6 mm | +10.1 mm |
| Weight | 367 g | 167 g | +200 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BL8800 Pro better than Galaxy S22?
- Battery capacity8,380 mAh vs 3,700 mAh2.3×
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.1″+8%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 10 MP+60%
Why is Galaxy S22 better than BL8800 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 1,500 nits3.1×
- Weight367 g vs 167 g2.2×
- OLED panelNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Thickness17.7 mm vs 7.6 mm2.3×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Charged in 30 min31% vs 63%2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 367 g | 167 g |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 176.2 mm | 146 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 70.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | White, Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Pink, Purple, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Dynamic Amoled 2X |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 425 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 856 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.9% | 88.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 920 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,398,273 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,840 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,830 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | — | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,380 mAh | 3,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 31% | 63% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, barometer, hall, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 4.1 |
