- android.gs
- Compare
- BL8800 Pro vs Moto G82
Blackview BL8800 Pro vs Motorola Moto G82
What BL8800 Pro does better (3) and where Moto G82 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display7.3
5.8Camera8.0
8.5Battery5.5
7.6Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
BL8800 ProMoto G82
| BL8800 Pro | Moto G82 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 176.2 mm | 160.9 mm | +15.3 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 74.5 mm | +9 mm |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8 mm | +9.7 mm |
| Weight | 367 g | 173 g | +194 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BL8800 Pro better than Moto G82?
- Battery capacity8,380 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+68%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
Why is Moto G82 better than BL8800 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Weight367 g vs 173 g2.1×
- OLED panelNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Thickness17.7 mm vs 8 mm2.2×
- Memory card slotNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Charged in 30 min31% vs 57%+84%
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 500 nits+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio70.9% vs 86.4%+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 367 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 176.2 mm | 160.9 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Meteorite Gray, White Lily |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 690 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.9% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 380,812 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,977 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 361 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,380 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 31% | 57% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
