- android.gs
- Compare
- Zenfone 8 vs Galaxy F62
Asus Zenfone 8 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
What Zenfone 8 does better (16) and where Galaxy F62 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display5.2
9.2Camera7.5
3.0Battery8.0
9.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zenfone 8Galaxy F62
| Zenfone 8 | Galaxy F62 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 148 mm | 163.9 mm | −15.9 mm |
| Width | 68.5 mm | 76.3 mm | −7.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 218 g | −49 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zenfone 8 better than Galaxy F62?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 420 nits2.6×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy F62: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy F62: No
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Weight169 g vs 218 g+29%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Pixel density446 ppi vs 393 ppi+13%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.73 GHz+4%
Why is Galaxy F62 better than Zenfone 8?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+75%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
- Memory card slotNo · Zenfone 8: Yes
- Screen size5.9″ vs 6.7″+14%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.9% vs 86.7%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 169 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 148 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 68.5 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Obsidian Black, Horizon Silver | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 420 nits |
| Measured brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 86.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Exynos 9825 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.73 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | 676,001 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,604 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 72% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.74 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Zen UI 8 | One UI 5 |
