How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Zenfone 8 Flip vs Galaxy Z Fold5

Asus Zenfone 8 Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

What Zenfone 8 Flip does better (7) and where Galaxy Z Fold5 wins (19) — every spec side by side.

Asus Zenfone 8 Flip
Asus · 2021Zenfone 8 Flip
5.3Score
7 advantages≈ $410
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Z Fold5
6.8Score
19 advantages≈ $490
Higher score
3.0Display4.7
2.7Performance6.2
8.3Camera7.6
5.9Battery5.0
5.9Features6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Zenfone 8 FlipGalaxy Z Fold5
77.3 × 1659.6129.9 × 154.96.1
Zenfone 8 FlipGalaxy Z Fold5Difference
Height165 mm154.9 mm+10.1 mm
Width77.3 mm129.9 mm−52.6 mm
Thickness9.6 mm6.1 mm+3.5 mm
Weight230 g253 g−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Zenfone 8 Flip better than Galaxy Z Fold5?

  1. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+14%
  2. Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
  3. Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
  4. Memory card slotYes · Galaxy Z Fold5: No
  5. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  6. Weight230 g vs 253 g+10%
  7. Pixel density395 ppi vs 373 ppi+6%

Why is Galaxy Z Fold5 better than Zenfone 8 Flip?

  1. AnTuTu score675,851 vs 1,250,358+85%
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
  3. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  4. Optical stabilisationNo · Zenfone 8 Flip: Yes
  5. Wireless chargingNo · Zenfone 8 Flip: Yes
  6. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  7. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,673 vs 4,824+31%
  8. Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,750 nits+75%
  9. Measured brightness735 nits vs 1,257 nits+71%
  10. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  11. eSIMNo · Zenfone 8 Flip: Yes
  12. CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+18%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight230 g253 g
Thickness9.6 mm6.1 mm
Height165 mm154.9 mm
Width77.3 mm129.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protection—IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 6Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursGalactic Black, Glacier SilverIcy Blue, Phantom Black, Cream, Gray, Blue
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size6.7″7.6″
PanelSuper AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,812 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,176 px
Pixel density395 ppi373 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits1,750 nits
Measured brightness735 nits1,257 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.2%91.1%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5GQualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process5 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.84 GHz3.36 GHz
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 740
AnTuTu score675,8511,250,358
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,6734,824
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—3,603
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera64 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.73"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera—4 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh4,400 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—12 h
Wired charging30 W25 W
Charged in 30 min—50%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-26.8 LUFS-25.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1.24 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 11Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceZen UI 8One UI 9.0
Major OS updates promised—4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare