- android.gs
- Compare
- ROG Phone 6 vs Reno9 Pro+
Asus ROG Phone 6 vs OPPO Reno9 Pro+
What ROG Phone 6 does better (9) and where Reno9 Pro+ wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display7.6
7.8Camera8.9
8.4Battery6.4
7.6Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Phone 6Reno9 Pro+
| ROG Phone 6 | Reno9 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173 mm | 161.5 mm | +11.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 73.6 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 10.3 mm | 8 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 239 g | 192 g | +47 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Phone 6 better than Reno9 Pro+?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+28%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 950 nits+26%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Reno9 Pro+: No
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 3 GHz+6%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Reno9 Pro+ better than ROG Phone 6?
- Optical stabilisationNo · ROG Phone 6: Yes
- Wired charging65 W vs 80 W+23%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
- Weight239 g vs 192 g+24%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min71% vs 135%+90%
- Thickness10.3 mm vs 8 mm+29%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.2% vs 90.9%+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 239 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 10.3 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 173 mm | 161.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Phantom Black, Storm White | Black, Gold, Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,448 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 950 nits |
| Measured brightness | 826 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2% | 90.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,478,125 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,509 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,793 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | 135% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 (side) | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 13 |
