- android.gs
- Compare
- ROG Phone 3 vs iQOO 5 Pro 5G
Asus ROG Phone 3 vs Vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G
What ROG Phone 3 does better (10) and where iQOO 5 Pro 5G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.7
8.4Camera9.5
7.6Battery5.5
8.7Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Phone 3iQOO 5 Pro 5G
| ROG Phone 3 | iQOO 5 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171 mm | 159.6 mm | +11.4 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 73.3 mm | +4.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.9 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 240 g | 198 g | +42 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Phone 3 better than iQOO 5 Pro 5G?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · iQOO 5 Pro 5G: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera24 MP vs 16 MP+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is iQOO 5 Pro 5G better than ROG Phone 3?
- Wired charging30 W vs 120 W4×
- Optical stabilisationNo · ROG Phone 3: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · ROG Phone 3: Yes
- Weight240 g vs 198 g+21%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio79.9% vs 89.4%+12%
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 8.9 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 240 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 171 mm | 159.6 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 73.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | — |
| Colours | Black Glare | White, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 650 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 719 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 79.9% | 89.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 621,932 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 13,306 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 24 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 300% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 (side) | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.74 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ROG UI | — |
